Dave404
06-13-2007, 06:57 AM
As seen in a previous thread their are a lot of integrated services appearing in Alberta. So what is the big benefit....not that I am against it, I am all for it.
My reasoning is simple, current ambulance service is gone on interfacility transfers to Calgary quite often, area coverage is provided by flexed ambulances, but this increases response times. FD does first response and co-response on Delta and Echo calls, Bravo calls if the response time is greater than 10 minutes.
What I would like to see - EMS system in place where the ambulance is run by the FD - ambulance is in town 90% of the time. Back up unit could be BLS (frontline ALS). Some calls will require direct transfer to the city, but majority would be to local hospital. No inter facility transfers - to me that is what the Calgary Health Region is for.
Lethbridge provides interfacility transfer service, but staff is called in and paid overtime - excellent idea.
What are your thoughts on amalgamated service? Does it save money in the long run? Does it provide better patient care through faster response?
My reasoning is simple, current ambulance service is gone on interfacility transfers to Calgary quite often, area coverage is provided by flexed ambulances, but this increases response times. FD does first response and co-response on Delta and Echo calls, Bravo calls if the response time is greater than 10 minutes.
What I would like to see - EMS system in place where the ambulance is run by the FD - ambulance is in town 90% of the time. Back up unit could be BLS (frontline ALS). Some calls will require direct transfer to the city, but majority would be to local hospital. No inter facility transfers - to me that is what the Calgary Health Region is for.
Lethbridge provides interfacility transfer service, but staff is called in and paid overtime - excellent idea.
What are your thoughts on amalgamated service? Does it save money in the long run? Does it provide better patient care through faster response?