Go Back   The Firehall.com Forum > The Lounge > Greetings
FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

View Poll Results: Which test is best for physical
CPAT 7 50.00%
IMFRAC 1 7.14%
York University 6 42.86%
Brock University 0 0%
Voters: 14. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 05-14-2011, 08:19 AM
Smokin_TDI's Avatar
Smokin_TDI Smokin_TDI is offline
 
Posts: 363
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BluntHonest View Post
So, am I the only who notices that the physical testing is a complete shamble. It is so apparent here in Ottawa by the recruits who have been hired over the last few years. I came through under the old IMFRAC testing which was tough and meant to rate you based on how in shape you are and how good you were at dealing with stress. I am not saying that all recruits are ... er... crappy, but there sure is a lot of them that are not in shape. Hell, they even make them do Combat Challenge style training ( which they have to pass by week 11 of drill school ). The CPAT is not even a factor as they make it kinda like getting your eye test after you have been interviewed. It is the kind of thing you want to test volunteer on not full time firefighters. I mean it is one thing to drop a physical standard to allow minorities on to the floor but to what level should we set the bar ?

What about the old guys that have trouble cramming their gut into their gear or making it up a flight of stairs at a call? It's ok because they were in wicked shape and aced some IMFRAC test when they got hired?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-15-2011, 08:00 AM
ndvfd_ff33 ndvfd_ff33 is offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1,521
Send a message via MSN to ndvfd_ff33
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BluntHonest View Post
So, am I the only who notices that the physical testing is a complete shamble. It is so apparent here in Ottawa by the recruits who have been hired over the last few years. I came through under the old IMFRAC testing which was tough and meant to rate you based on how in shape you are and how good you were at dealing with stress. I am not saying that all recruits are ... er... crappy, but there sure is a lot of them that are not in shape. Hell, they even make them do Combat Challenge style training ( which they have to pass by week 11 of drill school ). The CPAT is not even a factor as they make it kinda like getting your eye test after you have been interviewed. It is the kind of thing you want to test volunteer on not full time firefighters. I mean it is one thing to drop a physical standard to allow minorities on to the floor but to what level should we set the bar ?
You remind me of some of the old guys we have kickin around in the military. They feel the need to remind us how things were "back in the day" and that a lot of us wouldn't have made it. I, along with most others, could give a rodents rectum about how things were.

That was then. This is now and things change. Get over it.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-16-2011, 02:59 PM
Dreamcatcher Dreamcatcher is offline
 
Location: Quinte
Posts: 293
Default

Any other opinions on the way the various physical testing is run?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-28-2012, 05:08 PM
SNOWDOG's Avatar
SNOWDOG SNOWDOG is offline
 
Posts: 228
Default

the only one i have done is Edmonton's and it sounds like it's a unique one, CPAT looks easy.

http://www.edmonton.ca/for_residents...ness-test.aspx

you end up with an overall score out of 100, the 1 hr break is timed and it seems like about 15min.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-11-2017, 06:50 PM
report1033 report1033 is offline
 
Posts: 75
Default

I don't cruise through these forums much anymore.......and post even less. In fact I don't even know how I came across this but here I go beating the dead horse.

I don't think the CPAT is even close to a proper assessment of the physical ability needed to do this job. It is a very watered down version of tasks preformed on a fireground while not being properly weighted down or wearing the proper gear. If this test was used as a prescreen to ensure adequate fitness to preform an actual job related physical that would be different; but unfortunately many departments use this as their standard.

I believe it is unfair to the applicants to evaluate on a pass/fail basis as a candidate who puts in the effort and gets an overall better score should be rewarded. Sure everyone has strong/weak areas but over a job related test those should even out. When hiring candidates we should want the "best" and that includes being graded in fitness. I think Prince Albert and Edmonton have good physicals and Winnipeg's seems to be in the right direction as well.

I'm no athlete or fitness nut; but I've humped hose around tight cluttered floorplans, thrown enough ladders and pulled enough ceiling to know that the CPAT is not an accurate evaluation of the fitness required to be effective on the fireground.

Just my .002 cents.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-13-2017, 09:34 AM
hmckay91's Avatar
hmckay91 hmckay91 is offline
 
Posts: 425
Default

Quite the Necro...

http://www.firehall.com/forum/showth...highlight=CPAT

And my comment regarding...

Quote:
Originally Posted by hmckay91 View Post
OP

The Canditate Physical Ability Test (CPAT) was developed by the Fire Service Joint Labor Management Wellness-Fitness Task Force, which was comprised of representatives of the International Association of Fire Fighters(IAFF), the International Association of Fire Chiefs (IAFC), and local unions and their municipalities (10 pairs).

The test was designed as "a fair and valid evaluation tool to assist in the selection of fire fighters, and to ensure that all fire fighter candidates possess the physical ability to complete critical tasks effectively and safely."

It is true that for anyone with average fitness, coordination, dexterity, and strength, the test is easily accomplished well within the benchmark time (not surprisingly reasonably athletic people do fine at this). It is not in itself, a fitness assessment tool or a fitness test.

We get it, you don't like the CPAT and your welcome to your opinion. If you want to debate initial and ongoing fitness in firefighters give us some data/studies to work with to support your concerns, otherwise most are deferring to the IAFF/IAFC Subject Matter Experts...



Although not very tactfully stated it does seem to accurately reflect the situation. (e.g. Just binned an application based on a 2 minute conversation where the canditate expressed they "were likely overqualified..."
__________________
There's never time to do it right but always time to do it over.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.