Go Back   The Firehall.com Forum > Emergency Medical Services > Emergency Medical Transport
FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-12-2013, 11:58 AM
Luckyluc Luckyluc is offline
 
Posts: 1
Exclamation Can Fire Department Transport Medical Patients

This question has come up at my work (i ski patrol during winter months) and I am wondering what is the LEGAL standpoint of transporting medical patients as a firefighter. The question is are we allowed transporting in our fire apparatus/trucks, are we able to transport with EMT/Paramedic supervision or MD authorisation, does this apply to specialty equipment/vehicles (snowmobiles, ATVs, Side by side/Gator/Golf cart). What is the law or legal document stating this?
As a ski patroller I have been trained and certified in transporting patients off the hill and or to a ambulance. But in my fire training we have not been formally trained in transporting patient, and thus not certified in doing so.

To be clear I am not trying to see if we do or don't do it, or should or shouldn't. If itís in the best interest of the patient and you have sufficient medical training to do so safely then itís your call (and I would).
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-13-2013, 04:35 AM
guitarmedic87 guitarmedic87 is offline
 
Posts: 233
Default

I have no idea about the legal side of it, but this is how I see it. Can an ambulance physically get to the patient? If not, then the patient requires some sort of "rescue" whether it be via boat from an island, snowmobile or atv from the bush, or pick-up from an icy cottage lane. That falls under our job discription, rescue. If the ambulance can safely get to the patient, then no we should not be transporting as firefighters in any sort of vehicle. Some medics will want to accompany you the the patient and help with the "rescue" while others will not, but its important to communicate with all the allied agencies and develope a plan. I think, if it was considered a rescue, then the law would allow fire to "transport/rescue" the patient to the awaiting ambulance. But I have no documentation to support my views. Just common sense.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-09-2013, 04:09 PM
Medic9107 Medic9107 is offline
 
Posts: 24
Default

I don't quite remember all the details of this story, but a few years back I remember hearing about a fire crew that transported their patient to the hospital and got in big trouble for it. At the time I believe there were no available EMS units to respond and the pt was a possible MI.

So with that being said, I don't think they're allowed to on the legal side of things. Patient care would have been greatly delayed if the fire crew had not made that decision so it turns into a debate about doing what's right vs following all the rules.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-03-2013, 03:10 AM
alice alice is offline
 
Posts: 1
Default

This is useful information for you if you find yourself in the interview seat. Remember that the guys on the other side of the table really don't care about how many rescue and emergency courses you have under your belt, which fire program you took, who your dad is, how much you can bench, how much of an 'asset' you will be to the fire deparment, etc. All they want to know is if you will willingly do what you're told, follow orders, and not cause them any grief(additional cost) over the span of your career.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.