Not a Firehall.com Member? Click here to learn more about Firehall.com's great services. It's FREE!
Member Login
Login Name

Password

Text Size: [+] [+]

Patch Exchange random patch from the Firehall.com Patch Exchange

Site Stats

36,453 registered members

Forum

27,382 total threads
220,421 total posts

Upcoming Events

Aug 27, 2016
Scott FireFit Challenge - Ontario
Sep 10, 2016
CVFSA AGM and educational lecture
Firefighter Training Day
Scott FireFit Challenge - Alberta
Sep 11, 2016
Firefighter Career Expo
CFFF memorial service
Sep 14, 2016
Scott FireFit Canadian Nationals
OAFC Occupational Health & Safety Training Workshop
Sep 15, 2016
OAFC FireCon
Sep 17, 2016
IAFF Fallen Fire Fighter Memorial

Click here to Add an event

Flashpoint

[ Back ]

Posted by web-chief on Jun 1, 2012 @ 8:33AM

Snippet:

TORONTO, ON - In his May 30 letter to the National Post, OPFFA president Fred LeBlanc makes some valid points, but also some that are of dubious validity or at least coloured by association politics. Specifically;

“The OPFFA supports the sprinklering of all seniors’ residences in the province, and we have never advocated against this. What we do advocate is caution against the view that sprinklers are the complete solution to ensuring safety in seniors’ residences or any other structure.”

Excellent. Right on. Sprinklers are one part of a comprehensive fire protection strategy.

“Sprinklers may buy firefighters time by suppressing fire, but they don’t suppress the resulting smoke, which is the real killer in structural fires.”

True and false. Sprinklers buy time for firefighters and occupants, by suppressing fire AND the resulting smoke. Less fire produces less smoke. Yes, smoke is the real killer, and the effectiveness of sprinklers in reducing loss of life is largely due to their ability to reduce smoke propagation.




Source: Firefighting in Canada (click for full story)

For older posts and news visit our News Page
 
Firehall.com
Copyright 2011-2016 Annex Business Media. All rights reserved.