Our management team recently have made changes that prohibit us from saying "COPY" over the radio and instead want us to use terms like "ROGER", "AFFIRMATIVE" or other plain language.
My understanding of "COPY" after 18 years in the emergency services is that its an acknowledgment of understanding or having heard a message. Our management team suggests that "COPY" literally means "COPY" and that if it's being said the message received should be copied and repeated. Everything that I can find online suggests that I'm correct in my understanding but I'm wondering what others think and have experienced?
It's hard to change old habits and I'm not liking being pulled into the office and spoken to about occasionally saying "COPY", especially when it doesn't appear to me that I'm doing anything wrong.
In my opinion, your interpretation and use of the word "copy" is correct. We use it all the time in my department. It tells the sender that we have received and understand their message.
Dispatch uses "roger" all the time. Being a smart ass one night, when the dispatcher said "roger" I replied that he was on the ladder truck and not the engine Never got a response
Having worked in a police dispatch environment for many years I used 10-codes. Every now and then I will revert to using "10-4" instead of copy. Confuses some, but the old timers usually know what I mean.
Stay safe !!
"Copy" is not a reserved Procedure Word in radio telephony in Canada and the bosses are technically correct to suggest Roger or Affirm (not Affirmative due to confusion with Negative). However, their interpretation of "copy" seems even less correct than our customary usage of it.
I generally use "Copy" interpreted as below; as a response to a one to many message or overheard message.
... Copy does not mean the same as Roger or Received. It is used when communications between 2 other stations which includes information for your station that has been overheard and received satisfactorily.
But quite often in Emergency Services we still use "Copy" as an acknowledgement of transmission receipt instead of Roger even though it is not correct.
Good luck with the Management Team...
https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/smt-gst.n ... t-2011.pdf
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests